SFEIES24 Poster Presentations Diabetes & Metabolism (68 abstracts)
1University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; 2University of Limerick Medical School, Limerick, Ireland
Monogenic diabetes is estimated to account for as much as 4% of childhood and adolescent diabetes. Positive test rates for monogenic diabetes in the UK have been reported as 23%1. The aim of this study was to determine positive testing rates among adults within the University of Limerick Hospital Group catchment population of approximately 413,000 people. Adults (age >16years) who underwent screening for monogenic diabetes over a 24 month (January 2021 to December 2022) were identified from biochemistry laboratory records and included in the study. Hospital records were used to acquire clinical and biochemical data. Twenty-two adults underwent screening for monogenic diabetes during the study period. The mean±SD age at the time of screening was 47.3±18.1 years. 86.4% of this group underwent proband screening with the remainder having a relative with a known monogenic diabetes diagnosis. Nine adults (41%) tested positive for monogenic diabetes, seven for pathogenic GCK mutations and two for mitochondrial diabetes. There was no significant difference in mean±SD age of those testing positive (45.4±19.9years) vs testing negative (48.5±18.3years), P = 0.35. The positive testing rate among probands and relatives was 36.8% and 66.7% respectively. Islet antigen antibody testing and c-peptide measurement are considered a pre-requisite to genetic testing. However, n = 3(13%) had no previous antibody testing and c-peptide levels were not measured for n = 8(35%). When measured, c-peptide was detectable in all. A MODY probability score was not recorded for any patient yet was only applicable in n = 4 due to age>35 or missing biochemical data. To conclude monogenic diabetes testing rates among adult probands is 2.3/100,000 per year in the Midwest of Ireland. Rates of monogenic diabetes detection among adults within this region exceed the average reported across the UK1.
Reference1. Pang, L. et al. (2022). Diabetes Care, 45(3), pp. 642649. doi:10.2337/dc21-2056.