Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2024) 103 P39 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.103.P39

BSPED2024 Poster Presentations Gonadal, DSD and Reproduction 1 (6 abstracts)

Validation of a new short parent reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire for boys with a condition affecting sex development

Xanthippi Tseretopoulou 1,2 , Salma R. Ali 1,2 , Melissa Gardner 3 , Martyn Flett 4 , Boma Lee 4 , Stuart O’Toole 4 , Mairi Steven 4 , David E. Sandberg 3 & S. Faisal. Ahmed 1,2


1Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, Glasgow, United Kingdom; 2Office for Rare Conditions, University of Glasgow, UK, Glasgow, United Kingdom; 3Department of Pediatrics; Susan B. Child Health Evaluation & Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan Medical School, USA, Michigan, USA; 4Department of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK, Glasgow, United Kingdom


Background: To aid assessment of parent-reported outcomes (PRO) in the routine clinical setting in young children with any condition affecting sex development, a short questionnaire (PRO-CSD) that includes a parent-proxy report (PPR) and a parent-self-report measure (PSR) has been recently developed and requires further validation.

Methods: Parents of 98 boys with a median age of 2.9 yrs (range, 0.2,6.5) and a median external masculinisation score (EMS) of 11 out of a maximum of 12 (4,12) were recruited. Group-construct validity factors included surgical status, age, an integrated measure of multiple deprivation in Scotland (SIMD), EMS, reporting parent (mother vs father) and parental education. In a subset of 41 parents, test/re-test validity was also assessed by calculating intra-class coefficients (ICC).

Results: On the PSR measure, the parents of boys with an EMS <10.5 were more concerned about the ‘appearance of their child’s genitalia’ compared to those with a score >10.5 (P = 0.01). An association with EMS was also observed in the questions on ‘future social concerns’ (P < 0.01), ‘future relationships’ (P < 0.01) and ‘stress on receiving the diagnosis’ (P = 0.03). A lower proportion of parents who had completed tertiary education (14/56 (25%)) reported ‘feeling stress fitting their child’s condition into the usual routines’ and 4/56 (7%) reported that the condition affected ‘how often they go out socially’ compared to the non-tertiary educated parents, with 20/42 (48%), P = 0.03 and 11/42 (26%), P = 0.02, respectively. Amongst parents of boys below 2 yrs old, 11/33 (33%) reported ‘feeling stressed managing the child’s behaviour during the clinic visit’ compared to 43/65 (66%) parents of boys older than 2 yrs (P < 0.01). No differences were observed for individual items in the PPR questionnaire. The median ICC for all 28 questions in the PSR and PPR was 0.7 (0.4, 0.9) with only one question in the domain of ‘gender concerns’ having an ICC below 0.5.

Conclusion: The current validation study of the PRO-CSD questionnaire confirms its utility for assessing health-related quality of life outcomes in young boys with any condition affecting sex development. Further studies are required to explore the use of this questionnaire in girls and in other languages.

Volume 103

51st Annual Meeting of the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes

Glasgow, UK
08 Oct 2024 - 10 Oct 2024

British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.