Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2024) 99 EP19 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.99.EP19

ECE2024 Eposter Presentations Diabetes, Obesity, Metabolism and Nutrition (383 abstracts)

GLP-1 receptor agonists neuroprotective effect in type 2 diabetic patients is independent on glycemic control

Anna Simanenkova 1,2 , Oksana Fuks 1 , Natalya Timkina 1,2 , Irina Matsueva 1 , Tatiana Karonova 1,2 & Elena Grineva 1


1Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint-Petersburg; 2Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State medical University, Saint-Petersburg


Background and aim: Acute and chronic brain dyscirculation comprise one of the main reasons of death and disability in type 2 diabetes. Glucose-lowering drugs of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) group have proved to decrease myocardial infarction and stroke incidence, nevertheless their influence on chronic brain damage in not fully studied. Taking into account existing guidelines recommending treatment with GLP-1RA even for patients with satisfactory glycemic control, our aim was to study the influence of semaglutide in type 2 diabetic patients with target glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level on cognitive function and circulating neuronal damage markers.

Materials and methods: Type 2 diabetic patients aged 45-75 with target HbA1c (6.7[6.6;6.9]%) on metformin monotherapy were randomly divided into two groups: ‘MET’ (n=28) – those who continued metformin monotherapy, and ‘SEMA’ (n=35) – patients who were co-administered semaglutide (Rybelsus, Novo Nordisk) for 6 months. Additionally, ‘Control’ (n=30) group was formed – healthy volunteers comparable by age and gender. In all groups the levels of HbA1c, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), neurofilament light chains (NLC) were determined initially, cognitive assessment was performed by MOCA and MMSE scores. In ‘SEMA’ group these parameters were also evaluated 3 and 6 months after.

Results: Baseline NSE level in diabetic patients was higher than in healthy volunteers despite satisfactory glycemic control (3.60 [3.19;3.78] ng/ml in ‘MET’ and 3.78 [3.05;4.32] ng/ml in ‘SEMA’ groups and 2.76 [2.28;3.30] ng/ml in ‘Control’ group). Similarly baseline NLC concentration was high in both ‘MET’ and ‘SEMA’ groups than in ‘Control’ one (4.95 [3.30;5.56] ng/ml, 5.25 [3.75;5.56] and 4.10 [3.27;5.30 ]ng/ml, respectively). HbA1c decreased in ‘SEMA’ group, though not significantly, remaining in the target range. NSE concentration decreased in ‘SEMA’ group in 3 months (2.95 [2.42;3.4] ng/ml) and remained normal in 6 months (2.93 [2.58; 3.33] ng/ml). NLC also decreased in ‘SEMA’ group in 3 months (4.25 [3.13;8.50] ng/ml and even more prominently in 6 months (3.50 [1.69;5.88] ng/ml). Patients in ‘MET’ and ‘SEMA’ groups had cognitive impairment, resulting in the decreased points by both MOCA and MMSE scales. SEMA administration led to cognitive 4improvement – by 6th month of therapy MOCA scores in ‘SEMA’ group was 27.5 [25.75;29.75] (the normal value is 26 and more) and MMSE scores was 29.0 [27.5;29.5] (the normal value is 28-30). We found negative correlation between NLC level and MOCA, MMSE scores (r=-0.512, р=0.005 и r=-0.703, р=0.000, respectively).

Conclusions: DM, even with satisfactory glycemic control, has a negative impact on the brain, which is manifested by neuronal damage markers increase and cognitive dysfunction. Semaglutide can be neuroprotective in diabetic chronic brain damage independently on glycemic control.

Volume 99

26th European Congress of Endocrinology

Stockholm, Sweden
11 May 2024 - 14 May 2024

European Society of Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.