ECE2022 Poster Presentations Calcium and Bone (68 abstracts)
Meir Medical Center, Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Kfar Sava, Israel
Background: Vitamin D supplementation is an integral component of treating patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Data have shown that monthly vitamin D supplementation is not inferior to daily regarding target vitamin D levels. Moreover, it has been argued that monthly supplementation might increase adherence. Patients adherence and satisfaction with daily versus monthly vitamin D supplementation have been hardly investigated. The current study evaluated osteopenic/osteoporotic patients adherence and satisfaction from vitamin D supplementation after switching from monthly to daily (MtD) dosing and vice versa (DtM).
Methods: Ambulatory osteopenic/osteoporotic patients visiting the endocrine clinic at a tertiary medical center were asked to switch their vitamin D supplementation from MtD and vice versa. Total monthly dose remained unchanged. Patients answered questionnaires regarding socio-demographic and medical status, compliance with vitamin D dosing (Morisky Adherence Scale 8; MMAS-8), satisfaction with vitamin D regimen and physical functional status (OPAQ-15) at baseline and 6 months after switching. Each group was compared to its baseline characteristics and to the parallel group.
Results: Among 72 ambulatory patients recruited (mean age 71.5±7.4, 91.7% female), 52 (72.2%) were switched from DtM treatment and 20 (27.7%) from MtD. 84.7% were taking anti-osteoporosis medications, 51.4% had a prior osteoporotic fracture and 76.5% were taking calcium supplementation. Baseline vitamin D level was 86.1±17.2 nmol/l. Both groups expressed good baseline compliance (mean 98.1%) with vitamin D regimen (MMAS-8 score ≥8). Baseline satisfaction with vitamin D regimen was good: 74% and 77.7% from DtM and MtD dosing, respectively. Baseline physical status was good in 63.9% and moderate in 33.3%. After switching, satisfaction level, adherence to vitamin D regimen, vitamin D level and functional capacity were not different compared to baseline. Yet, 68.8% of MtD and 52% of DtM patients wanted to remain on the current regimen. Among patients who experienced both regimens, 56.1% preferred daily and 43.9% preferred monthly.
Conclusion: Patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis had good adherence to monthly and to daily vitamin D regimens and expressed high level of satisfaction with them. All parameters remained stable after switching regimens. Most MtD patients preferred the new regimen. Additional large-scale studies are needed to evaluate the effects of various dosing regimens on patients satisfaction and adherence.