Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2021) 73 AEP808 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.73.AEP808

ECE2021 Audio Eposter Presentations Late Breaking (114 abstracts)

Significance of technology in diabetes care during pandemic in our county hospital

Azhar Al-Shaibany


Our Lady’s hospital/ Navan, Meath, Ireland, General Medicine/ Endocrinology unit, Navan, Ireland


Introduction

In last two decades, new technological advances have permitted the use of novel approaches to the management of diabetes. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) has been linked to improved HbA1c and overall quality of life. The evidence, however, is limited to retrospective studies. This audit was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of CGM before and after on HbA1c and quality of life in clinical practice setting during pandemic in our county for 12 patients in our local Diabetes Day Centre (DDC).

Methods

Data of diabetes patients identified from medical notes of DDC in Our Lady’s hospital of Navan for patients commenced on DEXCOM CGM since we started using CGM in 2019. Total number of patients recruited for this audit is12. All patients have type I diabetes mean age of participant is 38 years for 10–12 months duration.

Patients Contacted by phones to answer the following questions:

- Frequency of hypoglycemia (<4 mmol) episodes before and after getting CGM?

- HbaA1C before and after CGM? Collected from our lab system.

- Lifestyle quality after getting CGM system?

- Satisfaction: Are patients satisfied with DEXCOM CGM (less hypoglycemia, less stress in diabetes control, more confidence)? With rating (0–10) Score.

Results

Among 12 patients with type I diabetes who were commenced on CGM, it shows:

• All patients have no or very little hypoglycemia after CGM with hypoglycemia confidence.

• 90% of patients had reduced overall HbA1c after CGM and less diabetes distress.

• All patients noted remarkable improvement in quality of life.

• All patients satisfied with CGM technology and more than half of patients have 100% satisfaction and others more than 80% satisfaction.

Figure 1 Satifaction score of patients on technology.

Figure 2 Average HbA1c pre and post CGM.

Table 1 Hypoglycemia before and after, Hba1c before and after CGM
Number Hypoglycemia before CGM Hypoglycemia
after CGM
HbAlc before
CGM (mmol/mol)
HbAlc after CGM (mmol/mol) Life quality
after CGM
Satisfaction
score 0–10
1 up to few limes aclay, Twice a month 92 78 improved 7
2 up to 5 times a month Nil 94 64 improved 10
3 Once a month Once a month 74 70 Improved 10
4 Once a clay Once a month 66 55 Improved 10
5 Tree times/clay 3 times/week 88 73 Improved 10
6 4 times/week One time/week 66 58 improved 9
7 Once every week Once every 3 months 80 64 improved 8
8 Up to 8 per week Up to 2 per week 59 70 improved 10
9 Once per month No hypoglycemia 113 91 improved 8
10 Almost every day No Hypoglycemia 91 101 improved 10
11 Once per month No hypoglycemia 85 70 improved 8
12 Once every week No Hypoglycemia 50 Not done improved  

Conclusion

Obviously, it is highly recommended to consider CGM a common and useful tool in diabetes care who was at high risk of dysglycemia. It showed significant improvement in less time spent for day and nocturnal hypoglycemia. Patients feel safer and more confident during pandemic where the diabetes care facilities are very limited. It provided remarkable glycemic control and positive effects on HbA1c levels. Less dysglycemia, as a result, improved life quality.

/images/missingimage.jpg /images/missingimage.jpg

Volume 73

European Congress of Endocrinology 2021

Online
22 May 2021 - 26 May 2021

European Society of Endocrinology 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.

Authors