Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology
Endocrine Abstracts (2013) 33 P75 | DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.33.P75

BSPED2013 Poster Presentations (1) (89 abstracts)

How late is too late to treat with Growth Hormone? A case study

Elaine O’Mullane 1 , Susan O’Connell 3 , Edna Roche 2 & Hilary Hoey 2


1The National Children’s Hospital, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland; 2University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland; 3Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.


Introduction: 13.1-year-old boy referred for growth hormone (GH) treatment with extreme short stature.

Background: Born premature at 28 weeks gestation, fraternal twin, birth weight: 1.06 kg (−0.58 SDS). Neonatal course complicated by respiratory distress syndrome, grade 2 Intraventricular haemorrhage, grade 2 Retinopathy and failure to thrive. Although not born small for gestational age, he was small at term (1.67 kg (−4.18 SDS)).

Initial assessment at 13.1 years: Height: 125.2 cm (−3.86 SDS), Weight: 21.8 kg (−4.56 SDS), Tanner stage G1 P1 A1 TV 2mls. Parental Adjusted Height: −3.75 SDS. Height velocity for 0.9 years pre-GH treatment: 4 cm/year.

Management: GH treatment with Norditropin Simplex initiated at 14yrs (Height: 128.9 cm (−4.41 SDS)). GH doses ranged from 0.03−0.067mg/kg/day, titrated according to IGF levels. Pubertal development noted at 15.1 years.

Baseline investigations.
Insulin tolerance testPeak GH – 29.3 mU/l
Cortisol480 nmol/l (245–725)
24 h GH profile4 peaks >20 mU/l
IGF-113.9 nmol/l (23–90)
IGF-BP31.6 mg/l (2.1–5.3)
Bone age11 years
Skeletal surveyNo evidence of dysplasia
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)L1–L4 ‘Z’ score: −3.2 Total body ‘Z’ score: −3.1 Total body (%fat): 9.0 Android fat (%): 7.1, Gynoid fat (%): 19.2
Re-evaluation following 5 years of GH therapy at 19.3 years.
Height159.3 cm (SDS: −2.51)
Tanner stageG5 P5 TV 25/25mls
Height velocity2.5 cm/year
Parental adjusted height SDS−1.62 SDS
IGF-156.8 nmol/l (nmol/l)
IGF-BP36.77 mg/l (mg/l)
Bone age17 years
DXAL1–L4 ‘Z’ score: −2.4 Total body ‘Z’ score: −3.0 Total body (%fat): 6.7 Android fat (%): 9.5 Gynoid fat (%): 11.4

Conclusions: GH therapy has improved this patient’s height with notable change in his android/gynoid fat distribution. Little is known about fat mass distribution in SGA children and adolescents during puberty. Gynoid fat mass has been positively associated with several cardiovascular risk factors and warrants further investigation.

Volume 33

41st Meeting of the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes

British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.

My recently viewed abstracts