ICEECE2012 Poster Presentations Obesity (114 abstracts)
1Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Diseases of Metabolism, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Different hypothesis exist about the mechanism of glycose control after bariatric surgery involving intestinal bypass. The aim of our study was to determine the insulin and C-peptide response after test meal (Fresubin drink a 200 ml; 200 kcal, 15% protein, 30% fat and 55% carbohydrate) before (day 0) and 5 days after gastric by pass surgery. Glycaemia (mmol/l; glucose oxidase), insulin (ECLIA, Roche Diagnostics, pmol/l) and C-peptide (ECLIA, Roche Diagnostics, pmol/l) were determined in 22 obese patients (age: 36.22±12.66; BMI: 44.60±4.31 kg/m2) in two separate days in 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min. There were no significant difference between areas under the glucose curve (X±S.D.; 645.562±20.545 vs 621.600±24.071 mmol/l per min; P=0.304) and under the C-peptide curve (293 074.125±23 539.975 vs 267 750.375±19 685.409 pmol/l per min; P=0.317) while there was significant lower area under the insulin curve in day 5 (38 263.075±6079.509 vs 23 539.875±2571.388 pmol/l per min; P=0.032). There was significant difference between basal glucose in 0 vs 5 day (4.695±0.168 vs 4.090±0.177; P=0.0113) while there were no significant difference between basal insulin (100.514±24.191 vs 61.229±7.166; P=0.118) and C-peptide (1400.952±180.160 vs 1074.571±96.986; P=0.097). There were no significant difference between peak levels in glucose (6.330±0.218 vs 6.165±0.236; P=0.482), insulin (635.555±103.576 vs 416.145±52.408; P=0.066) and C-peptide (3300.900±279.453 vs 3286.800±280.226; P=0.960) in day 0 and 5. In conclusion, insulin response after test meal is significantly decreased after gastric by pass surgery after 5 days without significant difference in glucose response, indicating early improvement in insulin sensitivity.
Declaration of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.