SFEBES2012 Poster Presentations Clinical practice/governance and case reports (90 abstracts)
1Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; 2Department of urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom; 3Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Introduction: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard treatment for adrenal lesions. High volume centres with input from endocrinologists and urologists with a special interest in adrenal lesions may have best outcomes. Aims: To audit our practice and set standards with reference to preoperative workup and postoperative follow-up. This is a single centre, single surgeon experience of surgical adrenalectomy.
Material & Method: Over a 10 year period 71 adrenalectomies were performed. 55 clinical notes were available for review. M:F 24:31, with equal gender distribution amongst all age groups except the 2130 yr group (M: F 0:4). Most patients (n=18) were in the 6th decade. 33/55 cases were referred by endocrinologists, 13 from other medical specialities, 8 by other surgical specialties, with a single direct primary care referral. 24 patients had left sided, 24 had right sided solitary lesions, and 7 cases underwent bilateral adrenalectomy.
Results: The formal adrenal CT protocol was followed in only 10/55 cases. Input from an endocrinologist was available in 44/55 cases preoperatively and 33/55 postoperatively. 11/55 were discussed in the relevant specialty MDT. Whilst most patients have some form of endocrine assessment, few had all of the appropriate tests done. The urologist followed up 44/55 cases within 16 weeks. The endocrinologists had no follow up for 17 cases, largely because they were non-functioning adenomas.
Conclusion: In the previous 10 years, patients presenting to our service with adrenal lesions do not appear to have received the service we would hope them to have. Adrenal protocol CTs are frequently not performed for incidental lesions and full endocrine assessment is not always performed preoperatively. We have set standards to tighten our processes since this audit was carried out.
Declaration of interest: There is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Funding: No specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.