BES2003 Poster Presentations Steroids (39 abstracts)
Department of Endocrinology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
The cortisol day curve has been advocated in the assessment of glucocorticoid replacement therapy in adrenal failure but remains controversial.
Objective: To determine the validity of this test within our practice.
Method: A retrospective analysis using endocrine laboratory dataset.
Results: 102 inpatient cortisol day curves from 76 patients were analysed. The serum cortisol was checked at 5 time points (pre and 1 hour post morning dose, before midday dose, pre and post evening dose). Mean age was 56 range 16-84years. 56 percent were male. There were 31 tests on a hydrocortisone 10/5/5milligrams dosing regimen and 25 tests on 20/10milligrams. The remainder were on varying regimen with a total dose of 10-50milligrams per day.
The pre-dose 1 cortisol concentration varied from undetectable (48percent) to 451nanomoles per litre. The post dose 1 level ranged from 123 to >1342nanomoles per litre (11 percent <500nanomoles per litre and 26 percent >900nanomoles per litre). Females had a significantly higher cortisol level 843+/-40 versus 738+/-29 (p=0.032) despite no significant difference in the dosage. There was no significant correlation between the dosage and the post dose 1 cortisol level. Pre dose 2 levels varied from 37-1086nanomoles per litre. 2 tests were <100nanomoles per litre and 15 percent of tests had values >600nanomoles per litre. Dose one correlates with the pre dose 2 level (r=0.378 p=<0.001). Pre dose 3 levels varied from 29-1178nanomoles per litre (27 percent <100nanomoles per litre and 5 percent >600nanomoles per litre). Dose 2 correlates with pre dose 3 level (r=0.342, p=0.012). 1 hour post dose 3 correlates with dose 3 (r=0.283, p=0.01)
Conclusion: The cortisol day curve is a useful tool and able to distinguish between varying doses of hydrocortisone. This test, although useful, must be interpreted with caution because of the great variability in the measured response.